THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RICHARD A. RELPH
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0281
Application 08/248,6251
______________
HEARD: June 10, 1999
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed May 24, 1994. According
to Appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/760,620, filed September 16, 1991, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007