THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 43
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YASUO ISHIDA, KAZUNARI OHTA and HARUTOSHI YOSHIKAWA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0332
Application No. 08/075,0171
____________
HEARD: July 15, 1999
____________
Before CAROFF, JOHN D. SMITH and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection
(Paper No. 16) of claims 21-40. Subsequent to the final
rejection, appellants first cancelled claims 21-40 and added
claims 41-50 (Paper No. 17: Amendment E); then cancelled
1Application for patent filed June 11, 1993. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/760,392, filed September 16, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007