Appeal No. 96-0338 Application 08/095,179 As a starting point the subject matter of independent claims 1 and 22 on appeal is derived from a showing in appellants' Figure 2 within the large dashed block element which in turn feeds the voice recognizer circuit element 10. In an analogous manner, Kroschel's Figure 1 at the bottom of page 82 of that reference shows conceptually his noise reduction system feeding a speech recognition system. The examiner's reliance upon the specific types of cepstral coding features discussed at column 1 of page 83 relate only to the speech recognition block in Kroschel's Figure 1 at the bottom of page 82 as expressed in the topic heading at the top of column 1 at page 83. On the other hand, the specific noise reduction techniques taught in this reference beginning at the bottom of column 1 at page 84 of this reference conceptually relate to the noise reduction block in Figure 1 at the bottom of page 82 of this reference. Column 2 of page 84 relates to a specific approach, apparently the only approach actually taught in Kroschel, to reducing noise within an incoming signal which approach is based upon the average of the noise power spectrum calculated by FFT in speech pauses according to a particular 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007