THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROTOSHI NOMURA, KEIJI NAKAYAMA,
HISAKAZU TAKAGISHI and TOKUMI IKEDA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0345
Application No. 08/101,9991
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 5 through 7, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed August 4, 1993.
2Claim 5 has been amended after the final rejection (Paper No. 7).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007