Ex parte SEHGAL et al. - Page 5




                     Appeal No. 96-0352                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 08/031,563                                                                                                                                            


                                We also reverse the examiner’s alternative rejection of appealed claim 1 on the grounds of                                                             

                     obviousness-type double patenting.  The examiner contends that methemoglobin reductase enzyme is                                                                  

                     often added to hemoglobin to maintain its structural and functional stability , and “because of prior art                                                         

                     knowledge that establishes the importance of methemoglobin reductase activity in the amounts claimed,"                                                            

                     modifications and variations of the product defined by patented claim 1 of the Sehgal patent would have                                                           

                     been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.  See the answer at page 12.                                                                                     

                                We have reviewed the five references of record which are “presented to merely make of                                                                  
                     record prior art knowledge  and what the skilled worker already knows” (answer, page 12), but we2                                                                                                                           

                     find no explicit disclosure of the “importance of methemoglobin reductase activity” in the range claimed                                                          

                     here.  In this regard, we point out that Scheinberg teaches that chemical reductants which function                                                               

                     analogously to the enzyme “need not be stoichiometrically equivalent to or greater than the quantity of                                                           

                     oxygen” (emphasis added) to which a hemoglobin product used to absorb carbon monoxide would be                                                                    

                     exposed during processing or use.  See this reference at column 3, line 66 to column 4, line 41.  Thus,                                                           

                     we agree with appellants that no reference of record suggests that a polymerized hemoglobin product                                                               

                     as defined by the patented claim should be prepared to have the “specific enzyme activity”, i.e., “from                                                           

                     about 1.0 to about 2.0 units of enzyme activity”.  Thus, the rejection for obviousness-type double                                                                

                                2Consistent with the practice suggested in In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341, 1342, n.1, 166 USPQ                                                              
                     406, 407, n. 1, (CCPA 1970),  these references should have been included in the examiner’s statement                                                              
                     of rejection.  In light of the prosecution history and our disposition of this appeal, we will not exercise                                                       
                     our discretion to remand this application to the examiner to modify the statement of rejection.                                                                   
                                                                                          5                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007