THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 56
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TAKAO NAKAMURA, TAKAAKI SHIRAKURA and
NIROYUKI KATAOKA
____________
Appeal No. 96-0366
Application No. 07/933,8931
____________
HEARD: September 9, 1996
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the final rejection of claims 1 through 9, 13, 15, 16, and 22.
1Application for patent filed August 24, 1992.
According to the appellants, the application is a
continuation of Application No. 07/224,360, filed
July 26, 1988; now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007