THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 43
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CARL N. BARON, STEPHEN L. MERKEL,
and ROBERT C. HALL
____________
Appeal No. 96-0417
Application No. 07/951,3081
____________
HEARD: July 13, 1999
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 33 through 47, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
BACKGROUND
1Application for patent filed September 24, 1992.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/791,151, filed November 13, 1991, now
abandoned; which is a division of Application 07/367,388,
filed June 16, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,065,695.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007