THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BURKHARD ROSE
____________
Appeal No. 96-0419
Application No. 07/928,0631
____________
HEARD: June 10, 1999
____________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1, 3, 4 and 7 through 10, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
Appellant's invention relates to a composition for permanent waving of human hair comprising a
reducing agent and 0.01 to 0.2% by weight, of the total composition, of a chlorophyll or chlorophyll
derivative which is at least partially water soluble, its manufacture and
1Application for patent filed August 11, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007