THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KARL-HEINZ DOPKE, GARLICHS SIEMEN
and HORST RATHERT
____________
Appeal No. 96-0425
Application No. 08/108,9861
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 6 and 11. Claims 8 through 10,
13, 14 and 16 through 23 have been allowed. Claims 7, 12 and
15 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed August 18, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007