Ex parte AOYAMA - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1996-0442                                                        
          Application No. 07/855,442                                                  


               wherein the composite dielectric layers are formed of x                
          mol% of aluminum nitride and (100 - x) mol% of silicon nitride              
          such that x is greater than 0 and less than or equal to about               
          95 mol% and the refractive index of the composite dielectric                
          layer is between 1.70 and 2.15.                                             

               13. A composite dielectric layer for use in an optical                 
          recording medium comprising x mol% of aluminum nitride and                  
          (100 - x) mol% of silicon nitride such that x is greater than               
          0 and less than or equal to about 95 mol% and the refractive                
          index of the composite dielectric layer is between about 1.70               
          and 2.15.                                                                   


                              THE REFERENCES OF RECORD                                
               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the               
          following references.                                                       
          Ohta et al. (Ohta)            4,390,600                Jun. 28,             
          1983                                                                        
          Takahashi et al. (Takahashi)       4,610,912                Sep.            
          9, 1986                                                                     
          Yamada et al. (Yamada)        4,680,742                Jul. 14,             
          1987                                                                        

                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1 through 5 and 7 through 21 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Yamada in view of                      
          Takahashi and Ohta.                                                         


                                       OPINION                                        
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007