Ex parte MATSUI et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                         
                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
                                                      not binding precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                                                              Paper No. 22               

                                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           
                                                              ____________                                                               

                                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                              ____________                                                               

                                        Ex parte IZURU MATSUI and KAZUFUMI TOMITA                                                        
                                                              ____________                                                               

                                                           Appeal No. 96-0473                                                            
                                                      Application No. 08/082,7271                                                        
                                                              ____________                                                               

                                                       HEARD: August 03, 1999                                                            
                                                              ____________                                                               

                Before METZ, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
                SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                    


                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               

                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims                 

                1 through 7, which are all of the claims pending in this application.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                          

                                1.  A microcapsule toner comprising a core containing a fixable component,                               
                        and provided thereon a shell, wherein the fixable component has a micro phase                                    
                        separation structure composed of a liquid continuous phase and a disperse phase                                  
                        containing a resin and having a glass transition temperature of not higher than 20EC,                            
                        and said fixable component contains a block and/or graft copolymer comprising two or                             
                        more monomer components, at least one of the                                                                     

                        1Application for patent filed June 28, 1993.                                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007