Appeal No. 96-0529 Application 07/981,207 The examiner cites Johnson, together with Tanaka, for application against the claims containing the limitation of a “reading means.” However, Johnson does not remedy the deficiency of Tanaka explained supra. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 16 through 19 under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) and of claims 6 through 9 and 13 through 19 under 35 U.S.C. 103 is not sustained. The examiner’s decision is reversed. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007