THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MEAD C. KILLION
__________
Appeal No. 96-0548
Application 08/161,6911
___________
HEARD: January 14, 1999
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 39-
58, which constitute all the claims remaining in the
application.
Claim 39 reads as follows:
39. A hearing aid comprising:
Application for patent filed December 3, 1993. According to appellant, the1
application is a continuation of Application 08/033,943, filed February 16, 1993, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/416,703, filed October 3, 1989, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007