Ex parte FUJIWARA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0632                                                          
          Application 08/131,376                                                      


          resin, a disk-shaped recording medium rotatably received within             
          said cartridge case, and a shutter for slidably opening and                 
          closing a window formed in said cartridge case, the improvement             
          wherein said upper and lower shells each include a plurality of             
          ribs respectively extending substantially symmetrically with                
          respect to each other with a central line therebetween, said                
          central line intersecting a rear edge of said case, said upper and          
          lower shells having distortion stresses in a rear edge portion of           
          each of said upper and lower shells before said upper and lower             
          shells are combined together due to said ribs, said rear edge               
          portions of said upper and lower shells bow toward the opposing             
          shell, wherein formation of a gap between said upper and lower              
          shells along said rear edge is inhibited when said upper and lower          
          shells are combined together, wherein said ribs comprise two end            
          portions of a side wall rib extending along said rear edge of said          
          case, and further wherein a thickness of said two end portions of           
          said side wall rib is greater than a thickness of said center               
          portion of said side wall rib.                                              
          The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                   
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Iwamoto et al. (Iwamoto)             4,814,927        Mar. 21,              
          1989                                                                        
          Muehlhausen et al. (Muehlhausen)     4,943,880        Jul. 24,              
          1990                                                                        
          Ikebe et al. (Ikebe)                 5,081,556        Jan. 14,              
          1992                                                                        

          Appealed claims 1, 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as unpatentable over Iwamoto.                                               
          Appealed claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                       
          unpatentable over Iwamoto in view of Muehlhausen and Ikebe.                 
          The respective positions of the examiner and the appellant                  
          with regard to the propriety of these rejections are set forth in           
                                            2                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007