Ex parte SUZUKI et al. - Page 1




                                      THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                      

                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                
                 journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                 

                                                                                                           Paper No. 26                                 


                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                    __________                                                                          

                                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                        
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                    __________                                                                          

                                           Ex parte YUJI SUZUKI and KAZUMI MUNEKATA                                                                     
                                                                    __________                                                                          

                                                               Appeal No. 96-0643                                                                       
                                                             Application 08/103,6771                                                                    
                                                                   ___________                                                                          

                                                           HEARD: January 14, 1999                                                                      
                                                                   ___________                                                                          


                 Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 

                 CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                               


                                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                          

                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-2, 4-10, and 12-13.  It appears from the                               

                 Examiner’s Answer that the rejections of the other remaining claims, Claims 3 and 11, have been                                        

                 withdrawn.                                                                                                                             


                          1  Application for patent filed August 10, 1993.                                                                              
                                                                           1                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007