Ex parte PARTOW et al. - Page 4

          Appeal No. 96-0671                                                          
          Application 08/192,078                                                      

               Accordingly,  Asher does not meet all of the limitations of            
          instant claim 5 and we will not sustain the rejection of claim 5            
          under 35 U.S.C. ' 102(b).                                                   
               The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                   
                                      REVERSED                                        





          Stanley M. Urynowicz, Jr.       )                                           
               Administrative Patent Judge     )                                      
                    )                                                                 
                                            )                                        
                                             )                                        
                    Errol A. Krass                  ) BOARD OF PATENT                 
                    Administrative Patent Judge     )   APPEALS AND                   
                                             )  INTERFERENCES                         
                                             )                                        
                                       )                                             
                    John C. Martin                  )                                 
               Administrative Patent Judge     )                                      

          tdc                                                                         













                                          4                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007