Appeal No. 96-0724 Application No. 07/817,232 Nieduzak et al. (Nieduzak) “Multigram Lipase-Catalyzed Enantioselective Acylation in the Systhesis of the Four Stereoisomers of a New Biologically Active "-ARYL-4- PIPERIDINEMETHANOL DERIVATIVE” Tetrahedron: Asymunetry Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 113-122 (1991) Wong et al. (Wong) EP 0357009 Feb. 1990. The appealed claims stand rejected for obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103) over the above cited references. We cannot sustain the stated rejection. Essentially, it is the examiner’s position that one of ordinary skill in this art would have been motivated to combine the teachings of the cited references “for the use of a particular enzyme for the hydrolysis of an ester or esterification of alcohols” because the prior art enzymes “would be similarly useful and applicable to the analogous process for esterification of alcohols and hydrolysis of esters,” as claimed (Answer, page 5). The problem with the examiner’s approach to the obviousness determination here is both factual and legal. Although the examiner has cited prior art references which disclose analogous reactants used to produce analogous 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007