THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HENRY YOKOYAMA, JAMES H. KEITHLY
and HAROLD W. GAUSMAN
____________
Appeal No. 96-0769
Application No. 08/203,3861
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, JOHN D. SMITH, and KRATZ, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 2-4, all of the claims
1Application for patent filed March 1, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a division of 07/860,413,
filed March 30, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,298,483, issued
March 29, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007