THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS C. COX
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0858
Application No. 08/117,6481
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before, JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 1-4, 6-10, and 12-17, which are all of the
claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed September 8, 1993.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/810,962, filed December 20, 1991, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007