Appeal No. 96-0965 Application 08/054,548 containing Appellants' first and second compounds and supported by the same specification which here supports claim 8. In view of the foregoing, we disagree with the examiner that Appellants' in vitro data is not predictive of a synergistic effect in vivo for the combination of first and second compounds recited in claim 8. The rejection of claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph is reversed. REVERSED SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. SMITH ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) DOUGLAS W. ROBINSON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) vsh 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007