Ex parte KIPPHAN et al. - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 96-0992                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/293,936                                                                                                                 


                          transformation matrix to convert the colorimetric                                                                             
                          deviation values into density deviation values.                                                                               
                          By converting colorimetric deviation values into density                                                                      
                 deviation values "only the measured value acquisition                                                                                  
                 apparatus needs to be replaced to refit a suitable printing                                                                            
                 plant for the process according to the present invention"                                                                              
                 (specification, page 9).  Independent claims 27 and 38, copies                                                                         
                 of which are found in an appendix to appellants’ main brief,                                                                           
                 are representative of the appealed subject matter.                                                                                     
                          In the prior decision, the merits panel held that the                                                                         
                 examiner had advanced acceptable reasoning to establish a                                                                              
                 prima                                                                                                                                  




                 facie case of lack of enablement with respect to the step of                                                                           
                 converting color deviations into a corresponding set of                                                                                
                 standard density deviations, and that appellants had not                                                                               
                 submitted evidence to rebut the examiner’s prima facie case.                                                2                          

                          2The 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, rejection of the                                                                       
                 claims in the previous appeal was based on a number of                                                                                 
                 additional aspects of the claimed invention which the examiner                                                                         
                 contended were not supported by an enabling disclosure.                                                                                
                 However, the merits panel sustained the rejection only with                                                                            
                                                                           4                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007