Ex parte WALTERS - Page 1




                                       THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                 

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is       
                                                           not binding precedent of the Board.                                                      
                                                                                                                      Paper No. 16                  

                                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                   
                                                                   ____________                                                                     

                                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                    
                                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                     

                                                         Ex parte JOHN P. WALTERS                                                                   
                                                                   ____________                                                                     

                                                              Appeal No. 1996-1045                                                                  
                                                           Application No. 08/143,4151                                                              
                                                                   ____________                                                                     

                                                                     ON BRIEF                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                     

                 Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                            
                 SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                              



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                     

                          This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims                          

                 3 through 10.  Claims 1 and 2, the only other claims pending in the application, have been withdrawn                               

                 from further consideration under 37 C.F.R. § 1.142(b) as not readable on the elected invention.  Claim                             

                 3 is illustrative:                                                                                                                 


                          1Application for patent filed October 26, 1993.                                                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007