THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 59
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TAI-SHUN LIN and WILLIAM H. PRUSOFF
________________
Appeal No. 96-1055
Application 07/727,3311
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
1Application for patent filed July 3, 1991. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/590,031, filed September 28, 1990, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 06/911,200,
filed September 24, 1986, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007