THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte GERALD L. BAUER, WILLIAM V. CHILDS CHARLES F. KOLPIN and DEAN T. RUTTEN _____________ Appeal No. 96-1110 Application 08/181,6691 ______________ HEARD: July 12, 1999 _______________ Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4-6, all of the claims remaining in the present application. The appealed claims are reproduced below. 1Application for patent filed August 14, 1994. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of application 07/990,368, filed December 15, 1992, now U.S. patent 5,290,413, issued March 1, 1994 which is a continuation of 07/736,227, filed July 26, 1991. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007