THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte FRANK R. CORRIGAN,
SAM ANTHONY and JOHN M. ZARICHANSKY
______________
Appeal No. 96-1118
Application 07/995,2291
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WARREN, WALTZ and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow
claims 1 through 22 as amended subsequent to the final rejection. Appellants have withdrawn the2
appeal with respect to claims 12 through 22, leaving appealed claims 1 through 11 for consideration3
on appeal.
1Application for patent filed December 22, 1992.
2Amendment of April 18, 1994 (Paper No. 8).
3Brief, filed September 14, 1995 (Paper No. 21; page 2).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007