THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BRIAN L. SIMPSON, GARY M. DISTEFANO, KEVIN M. LOGSDON, STEPHEN M. POPHAM and DONALD C. REID ____________ Appeal No. 1996-1154 Application No. 08/174,4971 ____________ HEARD: October 5, 1999 ____________ Before PAK, WARREN, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 12 which are all of the claims remaining in the application. Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: 1Application for patent filed December 28, 1993.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007