Ex parte PAISLEY - Page 5




                   Appeal No. 96-1165                                                                                                                                 
                   Application 08/060,422                                                                                                                             

                   Gorin and erroneously rejected claims 4, 18-21 and 24-26 on the basis of claim 1, step (b), over                                                   

                   Kertamus., i.e., the examiner has not considered the claims and references as a whole in determining                                               

                   obviousness and has therefore engaged in hindsight reconstruction of the claimed subject matter;  (iii) Gorin,                                     

                   Kertamus and Wheelock taken alone or in combination fail to teach or suggest the claimed subject matter                                            

                   because none of the references suggest using recycled carbon monoxide in the reduction of the metal                                                

                   sulfate, neither Gorin nor Wheelock disclose reducing sulfur dioxide to form sulfur and carbon monoxide,                                           

                   and Kertamus does not mention sulfate processing to obtain sulfur dioxide; and (iv) since “Gorin, Kertamus,                                        

                   and Wheelock are directed to separate, distinct and complete invention [sic, inventions] with quite different                                      

                   objectives, it would not be obvious to add, modify, subtract or substitute portions of apparatus or change                                         

                   reactions schemes from any one reference to give the claimed invention” (brief: p. 26).  We do not find any                                        

                   of these arguments persuasive.                                                                                                                     

                             Gorin discloses a process of reducing calcium sulfate in reactor 42 to calcium sulfide with a                                            

                   reducing agent which includes carbon monoxide, feeding the calcium sulfide to reactor 44 to oxidize the                                            

                   sulfide to calcium oxide and sulfur dioxide, feeding the sulfur dioxide into reactor 56 and reducing the sulfur                                    

                   dioxide to sulfur by subjecting the sulfur dioxide to a reducing gas and then to a Claus reaction (Fig. 2; col.                                    

                   2, line 26-59; col. 4, lines 30-64).  Gorin further teaches recovering gas from the conversion of sulfur                                           

                   dioxide to sulfur and recycling the gas in the initial stages of the process for producing sulfur dioxide.                                         

                   Reducing calcium sulfate with a reducing agent containing carbon monoxide is further taught by Wheelock                                            

                   (col. 1, lines 44-52).  Wheelock further teaches that the rate of the reaction is directly proportional to the                                     

                                                                                 -5-                                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007