THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROBERT ADLER
__________
Appeal No. 96-1225
Application 08/107,6961
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, JOHN D. SMITH, and OWENS,
Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claim 12 and refusal to allow claims 1, 3, 5-11, 13, 15, 16
and 18-23 as amended after final rejection. These are all of
1Application for patent filed December 30, 1993.
According to applicants, this application is a national stage
application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/EP92/00322 filed
Febraury 14, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007