Appeal No. 1996-1240 Application 08/044,961 1962). For the above reasons, we find that the examiner has not set forth a factual basis which is sufficient to support a holding of prima facie obviousness of the method recited in either of appellant’s claims 2 or 5. We therefore reverse the examiner’s rejection. DECISION The rejection of claims 2 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Pinckard is reversed. REVERSED 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007