THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte GREGORY J. RUSSELL-JONES
and STEVEN W. WESTWOOD
______________
Appeal No. 1996-1273
Application 07/956,0031
_______________
HEARD: October 5, 1999
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow
claims 3, 4, 14 through 21 and 25 through 29 as amended subsequent to the final rejection.2
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we cannot
1Application for patent filed November 30, 1992.
2See specification pages 29-30, the amendment of August 17, 1994 (Paper No. 12) and the
amendment of June 12, 1995 (Paper No. 20). The latter amendment further canceled claims 8 through
10, 30 and 31 which were finally rejected on October 19, 1994 (Paper No. 13).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007