Appeal No. 96-1301
Application 08/175,078
arrangement is shown in Figs. 9, 10 and 17, where the magnets
are alternating in polarity on the same side. The examiner
has not shown where Takahashi teaches that the polar
orientation of the magnets on opposing faces of the central
member is co-directional.
We agree with appellants that the Takahashi disclosure is
limited to a discussion of one side of the central member.
The Takahashi reference is silent with respect to the
orientation of the magnets attached to the opposite faces of
the central member. Polar orientation is discussed only with
respect to magnets on one side. The examiner may not resort
to speculation to produce the missing parts. The rejection
based on Takahashi is without merit.
Conclusion
The rejection of claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1-5, 7-15, 17-19, 21 and 22 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(a) or 102(b) as being anticipated by Hawsey is
affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1-5, 7-15, 17-19, 21 and 22 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(a) or 102(b) as being anticipated by Takahashi
is reversed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007