THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BRUCE R. CRUM, COREY G. KNUTSON, BRIAN M. NAASZ and
JEFFREY S. SMITH
__________
Appeal No.96-1315
Application 08/293,6111
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, CAROFF, and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the final rejection of claims 1-4, and
6-16. Claims 5, 17 and 18 remain in the application. The examiner has found claims 17
and 18 allowable and claim 5 objectionable.
1Application for patent filed August 19, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007