THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL J. URE
__________
Appeal No. 96-1347
Application 08/207,4691
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KRASS, LEE and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 4,
7-9, 12-14, and 16-19. The other claims remaining in the
application are Claims 10, 11, and 15, which have been
indicated as directed to patentable subject matter.
Claim 4 reads as follows:
1 Application for patent filed March 7, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007