Appeal No. 96-1380 Application 08/219,189 empty the collected residual toner from Bisaiji's belt cleaning unit 22: Instead of the removed residual toner being dumped into a container 22, where it must be manually removed, it would appear as an obvious expedient to the ordinary routineer to apply the proper bias to blade 22b, transfer member 19 and drum 9 in order that the residual toner initially cleaned from the transfer member be reattached to the transfer member and subsequently transported to a single cleaning station 10 by the photoconductive member 9. Whether the transfer member is an intermediate member, such as belt, or a direct transfer member, such as a roll, is considered to be of no patentable significance since the basic teaching of Davidge, et al. would be applicable in either case. [Answer at 4.] We agree with appellant (Brief at 7) that in combining the teachings of Davidge with Bisaiji in the foregoing manner, the examiner is relying to an unacceptable extent on hindsight gained from appellant's own disclosure. Compare In re McLaughlin, 443 F.2d 1392, 1395, 170 USPQ 209, 212 (CCPA 1971) ("Any judgment on obviousness is in a sense necessarily a reconstruction based upon hindsight reasoning, but so long as it takes into account only knowledge which was within the level of ordinary skill at the time the claimed invention was made and does not include knowledge gleaned only from - 10 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007