THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MAKOTO TOMIOKA
____________
Appeal No. 96-1480
Application No. 08/179,7791
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and KRASS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 6
through 28. In the parent application, the Board in a
1Application for patent filed January 10, 1994.
According to the appellant, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/770,713, filed October 3, 1991, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application No.
07/362,402, filed July 5, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007