THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEN TAKAHASHI et al
____________
Appeal No. 96-1530
Application No. 07/767,4881
____________
HEARD: January 13, 1999
____________
Before METZ, JOHN D. SMITH and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Takahashi et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 8 through 14, 16 and 17, which are all
of the claims pending in the application. Claims 8 through
12, 16 and 17 were amended subsequent to the final rejection.
1Application for patent filed September 30, 1991.
According to appellants, the application is a division of
07/211,041, filed June 24, 1988, now U.S. Patent 5,093,314.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007