THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAORU TORIKOSHI, KATSUHIRO SATO, HIROYUKI TANAKA,
FUMIAKI TAMBO and YUTAKA AKASAKI
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1568
Application No. 08/235,2351
____________
HEARD: November 4, 1999
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 29, 1994. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/153,198 filed November 17, 1993, now
abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/844,856 filed March 3, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007