Appeal No. 96-1628
Application No. 08/167,617
Consequently, Asao does not meet every limitation of the
claims, and we must reverse the rejection.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 11, 21,
22, 24, and 31 through 36 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) and claim
12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007