THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 50
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LESLIE W. PARTRIDGE
__________
Appeal No. 1996-1736
Application 08/418,2671
___________
HEARD: September 16, 1999
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON, and RUGGIERO, Administrative
Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed April 6, 1995. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/222,189, filed March 31, 1994, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/931,108, filed
August 17, 1992, now abandoned; which is a continuation of
Application 07/728,565, filed July 11, 1991, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/567,595, filed
August 15, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,055,963, issued October
8, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007