Ex parte COBB et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 96-1839                                                                  Page 2                  
              Application No. 08/024,610                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellants’ invention relates to an electroluminescent display with brightness                   
              enhancement.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of                            
              exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                               
                     1.  A backlit display comprising:                                                                    
                                   a case having an optical window and an axis;                                           
                                   an electroluminescent panel in said case;                                              
                                   a structured surface material between said electrolumin-                               
                                   escent panel and said optical window, said structured surface                          
                                   material having the property that light entering it while making                       
                                   an angle in a first predetermined group of angles with said                            
                                   axis will be reflected and light entering it while making an angle                     
                                   in a second predetermined group of angles with said axis will                          
                                   be refracted such that the majority of the light in said second                        
                                   group of angles will form an output wedge that is narrow[er]                           
                                   than said output wedge's associated input wedge, said angles                           
                                   in said second group of angles being greater than said angles                          
                                   in said first group of angles; and                                                     
                                   a light gating means between said structured surface material                          
                                   and said optical window.                                                               
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
                     Ukrainsky                           4,748,546            May  31, 1988                               
                     Abileah                             5,262,880            Nov. 16, 1993                               
                                                                      (Filed Aug. 06, 1992)                              
                     McCartney, Jr. et al (McCartney)       5,280,371         Jan. 18, 1994                               
                                                                       (Filed  Jul.  09, 1992)                            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007