Ex parte VALSECCHI et al. - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                         
                 for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                        

                                                                                                                Paper No. 20                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                  Ex parte ALBERTO VALSECCHI and RENZO TORTEROLO                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                          Appeal No. 1996-1864                                                                          
                                                    Application No. 08/330,3491                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before PAK, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
                 PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                      




                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s                                                                           
                 refusal to allow claims 1 through 18, 21 through 27 and 29                                                                             
                 through 35 which are all of the claims pending in the                                                                                  
                 application.  Claim 27 was amended subsequent to the final                                                                             
                 Office action dated July 14, 1995, Paper No. 8.                                                                                        

                          1Application for patent filed October 27, 1994.                                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007