THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ALBERTO VALSECCHI and RENZO TORTEROLO ____________ Appeal No. 1996-1864 Application No. 08/330,3491 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 18, 21 through 27 and 29 through 35 which are all of the claims pending in the application. Claim 27 was amended subsequent to the final Office action dated July 14, 1995, Paper No. 8. 1Application for patent filed October 27, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007