THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EMIKO HAMADA, YUJI ARAI, YOSIKAZU TAKAGISI and
TAKASHI ISHIGURO
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1876
Application No. 08/344,6631
____________
HEARD: December 7, 1999
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-22.
1Application for patent filed November 22, 1994.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 08/007,738, filed January 22, 1993, which
is a division of Application No. 07/515,421, filed April 27,
1990, now Patent No. 5,213,955.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007