Ex parte MEIER et al. - Page 1






                                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                              
                                                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                            
                     (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                                                          
                     (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 24                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                              
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                                                                     Ex parte REINHOLD MEIER                                                                                           
                                                                   and KARL KERGER-KNILLING                                                                                            
                                                                              ______________                                                                                           

                                                                           Appeal No. 1996-1897                                                                                        
                                                                         Application 08/064,1451                                                                                       
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                                                                       HEARD: December 7, 1999                                                                                         
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                     Before WARREN, WALTZ and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                 

                     WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                              
                                                                             Decision on Appeal                                                                                        
                                This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting                                                            
                     claims 12 through 14 and 16 through 29, which are all of the claims in the application.  Claim 12 is                                                              
                     illustrative of the claims on appeal:                                                                                                                             
                                12.  A form-fitting cast-on enclosure arrangement having parallel chucking surfaces for fixing an                                                      
                     irregularly contoured metal workpiece for processing, comprising a plastic material enclosure having                                                              


                     1Application for patent filed May 17, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a national stage                                                         
                     application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/EP92/01796, filed August 7, 1992.                                                                                        
                                                                                   - 1 -                                                                                               




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007