Appeal No. 1996-1897
Application 08/064,145
(emphasis supplied). Thus, we find that Wendt does not describe the invention encompassed by
appealed claims 26 and 27 within the meaning of § 102(b). See generally, Wiggins, supra; In re
Arkley, 455 F.2d 586, 587, 172 USPQ 524, 526 (CCPA 1972.
The examiner’s decision is affirmed.
- 16 -
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007