Appeal No. 96-1920
Application 08/218,136
In summary, we have not sustained any of the
examiner’s rejections of the claims except for the rejection
of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by the
disclosure of Takahashi ’785. Accordingly, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 1 and 3-12 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
21
Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007