THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SI-ZHAO J. QIN
and GUY T. BORDERS
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-1922
Application 08/110,5061
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-6, 8-10, 12-20 and 22-34.
The invention pertains to a system for controlling a non-linear process. Claim 1 is
illustrative and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed August 23, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007