Ex parte STEININGER et al. - Page 1




                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                 

                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not                                
                     written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                      
                     Board.                                                                                                

                                                                                      Paper No. 14                         
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                Ex parte HELMUT STEININGER, PETER HEILMANN                                                 
                                                 and MICHAEL WILLIS                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                                  Appeal No. 96-1936                                                       
                                              Application No. 08/274,6951                                                  
                                                     ____________                                                          
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                     ____________                                                          
              Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
              JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                     This is an appeal pursuant to 35 USC § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-11.                   
              Claim 12 stands withdrawn from further consideration as directed to a non-elected                            
              invention.  Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced below:                                               



                     1Application for patent filed July 14, 1994.                                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007