THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HELMUT STEININGER, PETER HEILMANN
and MICHAEL WILLIS
____________
Appeal No. 96-1936
Application No. 08/274,6951
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 USC § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-11.
Claim 12 stands withdrawn from further consideration as directed to a non-elected
invention. Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced below:
1Application for patent filed July 14, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007