THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN R. HURLOCK
and MANIAN RAMESH
____________
Appeal No. 96-1952
Application No. 08/163,7781
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 5 as amended
after the final rejection (see the Advisory Action dated June
7, 1995, Paper No. 8, and the amendment dated May 22, 1995,
1Application for patent filed December 9, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007