THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 69
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PAUL W. OSBORNE
and EDWIN HOFFMAN
__________
Appeal No. 96-2023
Application 08/139,6421
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed October 12, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/561,816, filed July 1, 1985, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 06/404,303,
filed August 2, 1982, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007