THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TSVI GOLDENBERG
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2043
Application 07/990,514 1
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
Application for patent filed December 15, 1992. According to1
appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of application
07/593,485, filed October 3, 1990, now U.S. Patent 5,188,632, issued February
23, 1993 which is a continuation of application 07/218,907, filed July 14,
1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007